Center of Excellence Column: OSINT Intelligence Cycles

This week in the Social Links Center of Excellence Column, we’re looking at intelligence cycles in OSINT. The communication of ideas is a crucial topic for many agencies, and a lack of understanding regarding the organization's needs can spell disaster for investigations. To help with this problem, we’re sharing our insights and giving you a glimpse into the cycle we use regularly.

Let’s jump in!

What are Intelligence Cycles?

Imagine a cybersecurity agency with multiple departments. Naturally, the organization must consider a wide variety of information at any given time. With suspicious activity from diverse sources, the experts in the agency need to have a clear idea of what is required and how to achieve the desired results. This is where intelligence cycles come into play.

Simply put, intelligence cycles are a systematic process that agencies and organizations use to acquire, analyze, and share data and sensitive information. Similar to decision cycles, such as the OODA Loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), these frameworks guide effective decision-making in response to evolving situations. Such information models help provide a structured approach for understanding, predicting, and responding to various challenges, from national security threats to geopolitical shifts and criminal activities.

The Adaptability of Intelligence Cycles

The intelligence cycle is usually the backbone of strategic data generation. However, almost every organization adapts the information model to fit their needs by tweaking the following elements:

• Number of stages. This element refers to how many steps are involved in the cycle. The amount of actions that the agency takes is usually the main difference between various information models. So, some agencies handle the whole process in four steps, while others accomplish the same task in seven.
• Definitions and categories. Terminology differences can easily create confusion when comparing intelligence cycles. A clear example of such variations is the “requirement” step, where some processes put it as a distinct stage while others incorporate it in the “direction” phase.
• Visual representation. This difference concerns the design of the intelligence cycle. While it doesn’t change how things work, it’s all about understanding the model with a single look. Usually, agencies favor circular models. However, some organizations overlap multiple circles or split the visual in two.

The key thing to understand is that just because an intelligence cycle differs from others doesn’t mean it’s worse. The designs reflect each organization's needs, priorities, and operational methodologies. Moreover, the differences highlight the adaptability of the concept to any context. With this idea in mind, we would like to introduce the intelligence cycle we commonly use at the Social Links Center of Excellence.

The RIS Propeller Intelligence Cycle in 3 Steps

Conceived in 2012 by Arno Reuser and unveiled at the CIISS 2013 and OSIRA 2014 conferences, the RIS Propeller Intelligence Cycle aims to update intelligence methodologies to fit modern needs. This innovative model focuses on the changing data landscape and covers three interconnected phases that focus on a vital focal point: the customer.

Step 1: Preparation Cycle

This stage aims to understand the research assignment or requirement clearly, ensuring the final product aligns precisely with the customer's expectations. During the preparation phase, a comprehensive action plan is formed and evaluated with the customer. This meticulous process ensures the intelligence product is accurate and perfectly tailored to meet the specific demands of the end user.

Application of the concept

Imagine you're a specialist working at an intelligence agency, and your goal is to counter terrorist activities. Here’s how you handle such a task:

• Start with understanding the customer's request. You should clarify and refine the requirements of the task.
• Discuss specifics like the area of concern, assessment timeframe, and interest groups.
• Develop clear objectives based on customer insights, outlining your approach, resources, and timelines. 
• Present the plan to the customer, seeking their input and approval.

Step 2: Reporting Cycle

This phase primarily covers researching and acquiring information. Experts gather, process, and index information to generate a comprehensive report. Specialists maintain the report’s integrity through a careful evaluation process in collaboration with the customer.

Application of the concept 

• Implement the plan to collect data from various sources.
• Analyze the information thoroughly, examine for patterns and trends, and use advanced analytical tools to identify relevant information. 
• Transform the analyzed data into a well-structured, clear, actionable intelligence report.

Step 3: Intelligence Production Cycle

This phase is critical as analysis unfolds, turning raw data into actionable intelligence for informed decision-making. As the final step, the experts compile the finished report and send it to the relevant stakeholders.

Application of the concept 

• Share the intelligence report with the relevant stakeholders, including other government agencies involved in counterterrorism and the customers.
• Encourage the customer to review the information, provide feedback, and share insights or additional requirements. 
• Collaborate with the customer to update the report based on the client’s evolving needs. Continued work allows for refining collection methods, analytical approaches, and reporting formats.

And that’s the end of our piece about intelligence cycles. The RIS Propeller Cycle allows us to collaborate with customers even when conditions constantly change. With regular feedback and discussion, we can continuously improve the quality of our work and bring new insights to our customers for optimized decision-making.